Decentralisation of public governance must not be reversed

Local governments are most acquainted with the needs of their residents and are better equipped to provide effective solutions. Poland is witnessing a troubling pattern of constraining the revenue of local authorities, even as expenses continue to rise.

Publikacja: 07.09.2023 02:23

Decentralisation of public governance must not be reversed

Foto: Wojciech Kordowski

– “The central government often lacks the capacity for empathy towards residents and may struggle to perceive their issues from a distant standpoint. On the other hand, local governments and civil society, by virtue of their proximity to the daily lives of residents, are better positioned to swiftly mobilise resources to provide assistance during crises”, emphasised Leszek Bonna, Vice-Marshall of Pomorskie Province at the discussion panel, “Local Government as the Foundation of Democracy”.

He went on to outline various instances that illustrated how decentralised governance proved notably more effective than centralised control. Examples included the reactions of various levels of public administration to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the handling of the influx of refugees from Ukraine in 2022. – “We were always half a step or one step ahead of the central government”, he added.

All panellists agreed that decentralised public authority with strong local governments is the indicator of democracy. Łukasz Konarski, Mayor of Zawiercie, noted that the opposite trends were emerging in Poland.

– “It's hard not to notice that authority is becoming increasingly centralised due to financial constraints. Our tax income is declining, while expenses are on the rise. The central government attempts to convince the Polish populace that it compensates for the revenue shortfall, but the provided funds are primarily designated for public development initiatives, leaving ongoing operations and essential tasks with insufficient funding”, warned Konarski.

The Mayor of Zawiercie pointed out that an increasing number of decisions concerning local communities are taken centrally. – “What we noticed is that we are inching towards the Hungarian model, where the local government has less and less to say”, he noticed.

– “Attempts of forceful centralisation through financial undermining of cities and municipalities or other ways of disenfranchising local governments pose a risk to the social and economic development”, Krzysztof Maj, member of Dolnośląskie Province Board, pointed out. He emphasised that three decades after the local government reform, a debate on it being adjusted to the contemporary reality and requirements should rather be initiated.

He illustrated the situation with healthcare services as an example. Rather than cooperating, hospitals under different ownership engage in competition, which is detrimental to the local community. Another issue raised during the panel discussion was the transformation of district-level local government, which has seen significant changes due to advancements in technology, among other factors.

– “Decentralisation in Poland is a fact, and it must not be reversed. Still, after such time, we have to find answers to the question, “What now?’”, the Vice-Marshall added.

Zdzislav Palevič, Mayor of Šalčininkai Region, Lithuania, pointed out that many functions and tasks of the Lithuanian state were decentralised, but some public services were being taken over by the central government. – “We need to expertly weigh advantages and costs of decentralisation and centralisation”, he emphasised.

PARTNER: ISW

Foto: .

– “The central government often lacks the capacity for empathy towards residents and may struggle to perceive their issues from a distant standpoint. On the other hand, local governments and civil society, by virtue of their proximity to the daily lives of residents, are better positioned to swiftly mobilise resources to provide assistance during crises”, emphasised Leszek Bonna, Vice-Marshall of Pomorskie Province at the discussion panel, “Local Government as the Foundation of Democracy”.

He went on to outline various instances that illustrated how decentralised governance proved notably more effective than centralised control. Examples included the reactions of various levels of public administration to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the handling of the influx of refugees from Ukraine in 2022. – “We were always half a step or one step ahead of the central government”, he added.

Gospodarka
Rosjanie rezygnują z obchodów Nowego Roku. Pieniądze pójdą na front
Gospodarka
Indeks wiarygodności ekonomicznej Polski. Jest źle, ale inni mają gorzej
Gospodarka
Margrethe Vestager, wiceprzewodnicząca KE: UE nie potrzebuje nowej polityki konkurencji
Gospodarka
Gospodarka Rosji jedzie na oparach. To oficjalne stanowisko Banku Rosji
Materiał Promocyjny
Klimat a portfele: Czy koszty transformacji zniechęcą Europejczyków?
Gospodarka
Tusk podjął decyzję. Prezes GUS odwołany ze stanowiska